<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eight Reasons Why Buying IT Now Is NOT Critical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/02/it-not-critical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/02/it-not-critical/</link>
	<description>product &#38; service innovation, business and technology strategy, content capitalization, playout intelligence, telco2.0.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/02/it-not-critical/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playoutintelligence.com/?p=576#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Daniel W. Rasmus&lt;/cite&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://cid-c07907dba0e3bea6.profile.live.com/&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Futurist in Washington&lt;/a&gt; wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://future-of-work.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C07907DBA0E3BEA6!1268.entry&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a great and valued response to my post&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please go ahead and read his posting, here is my response to him:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hello Daniel,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really like and appreciate your comments and fully underwrite them. You do make a couple of assumptions, though, and I would 100% follow you under these assumptions (as I said in my post, I intended to make some bold statements as a counter opinion). I especially like one of the recurring thoughts of- and I paraphrase - &quot;If your business model relies on IT, you better make sure it works - effectively and efficient&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And sometimes people might not realize how much their business model relies - or could rely - on IT. I recently helped a large wholesale appliance installation company and a one-man-show cabinet-maker to generate and track sales leads through an IT-based system, including social networking advertisment campaigns, dedicated blog sponsorship, and local sponsorship. I guess they never thought that this part of their business model was flawed because they used old computer systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am divided on your point of new talent attraction and &quot;latest cutting edge IT stuff&quot; as a must have - that is certainly true for some sectors (mine definitely!), not so much in other industries. I think this is a case-by-case decision, but you make a valid point here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In terms of &quot;IT for customer relationship management with customers from Delhi&quot; I certainly agree, a good example. And, as you also point out, just a part of the equation. I quoted some great comments by Seth Godin and Tom Peters in http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/01/07/tech-and-customer-service/ from a recent video interview they did with McKinsey, maybe you find that worth watching.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyways, I hope you get lots of responses, I myself am interested to see both sides discussed. And of course as an IT innovation geek I&#039;d like to see more geeky stuff around me ;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>Daniel W. Rasmus</cite>, a <a href="http://cid-c07907dba0e3bea6.profile.live.com/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">Futurist in Washington</a> wrote <a href="http://future-of-work.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C07907DBA0E3BEA6!1268.entry" target="_new" rel="nofollow">a great and valued response to my post</a>. </p>
<p>Please go ahead and read his posting, here is my response to him:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Hello Daniel,</p>
<p>I really like and appreciate your comments and fully underwrite them. You do make a couple of assumptions, though, and I would 100% follow you under these assumptions (as I said in my post, I intended to make some bold statements as a counter opinion). I especially like one of the recurring thoughts of- and I paraphrase &#8211; &#8220;If your business model relies on IT, you better make sure it works &#8211; effectively and efficient&#8221;.</p>
<p>And sometimes people might not realize how much their business model relies &#8211; or could rely &#8211; on IT. I recently helped a large wholesale appliance installation company and a one-man-show cabinet-maker to generate and track sales leads through an IT-based system, including social networking advertisment campaigns, dedicated blog sponsorship, and local sponsorship. I guess they never thought that this part of their business model was flawed because they used old computer systems.</p>
<p>I am divided on your point of new talent attraction and &#8220;latest cutting edge IT stuff&#8221; as a must have &#8211; that is certainly true for some sectors (mine definitely!), not so much in other industries. I think this is a case-by-case decision, but you make a valid point here.</p>
<p>In terms of &#8220;IT for customer relationship management with customers from Delhi&#8221; I certainly agree, a good example. And, as you also point out, just a part of the equation. I quoted some great comments by Seth Godin and Tom Peters in <a href="http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/01/07/tech-and-customer-service/" rel="nofollow">http://www.playoutintelligence.com/2009/01/07/tech-and-customer-service/</a> from a recent video interview they did with McKinsey, maybe you find that worth watching.</p>
<p>Anyways, I hope you get lots of responses, I myself am interested to see both sides discussed. And of course as an IT innovation geek I&#8217;d like to see more geeky stuff around me ;)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
