Out of my head I can think of three big opportunities for mobile WiMax and WiMax Femto cells: avoiding wholesale charges, upselling Internet access without PCs, power-efficient and simplified in-home communication

As I’m sitting relatively close (location-wise) to Comcast’s senior VP for wireless and technology, Dave Williams, a friend of mine asked me why Comcast would investigate the options of WiMax Femto cells when even traditional vendors such as Nokia Siemens Networks have not yet committed themselves. I’m no expert on WiMax at all, definitely something I have to catch up on, but from a quick review of some research, I would say that
Sure, we can all wait for LTE, leapfrogging WiMax, but who knows when that will be rolled out in Richmond, where we still have no 3G, and I dearly hope LTE will have a better power consumption pattern than 3G.
I just found a neat overview study by Unstrung Insider called “The Future of Mobile WiMax: Where, When, and How Much?”. It’s a bit older, from September 08, in a news release they talk a bit about the content…
Everyone is talking about console-less gaming or game streaming, but noone is talking about the Internet Service Provider’s business in it.
Average ad revenue in the US per subscriber per year will be…. tada: $4.86. And that’s in 2013. So even if Carriers would get 100% of this – which they won’t – 40 cents per month additional revenue is not really the biggest opportunity. But there’s more to the game.
Germany is determined to have 75 per cent of all German households receive broadband speeds of at least 50 Mbps by 2014. Germany also heavily pushes DTT, 3G, 4G. Will 4G deliver 50 Mbps? And if not, what business model and usage scenarios under these circumstances will allow 50 Mbps fixed access for 75% of
Content © Playout Intelligence
Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme designed by Artisan Themes